TwistingTruth is a journaling Bible study about Things They Never Told Me in Sunday School. I will be the first to admit that this blog can come off as very negative, but this is a venture that was undertaken largely because very few people in the church wanted to deal with these issues.

The short Table of Contents:

2012 — beginning a series on How Child Protective Services (CPS) opposes the Teachings of Christ.  I am studying this because too many people have patronized me and dismissed me as overreacting. They believe CPS is “basically good” but made a “few errors.”

2011, summer and fall — What Jesus said about Hell. I studied this because I wanted to find out what the future holds for the liars.

2010 — Liars and their Lies. I studied this because both DFCS (Division of Family and Children Services) and sheriff’s department officials knowingly gave false witness as part of their paid employment and even under oath.

It is not that I enjoy spending hours seeking negativity; it is that they never taught this stuff in Sunday school.

I really thought that I was done with Mayor Pete. Apparently not. Drudge Report just featured a CNN article where he— well, see for yourself:

mayor pete is gay



Okay, so he is crediting his creator with being a homosexual.  Except that he is wrong. 

Male and female He created them, and He blessed them. And in the day they were created, He called them “mankind.” Genesis 5:2  

God created male and female AND HE BLESSED THEM.  Really, the ignorance of the Bible combined with wacko practices of logic is a lethal combination. 

As designed by the Creator, sex has two primary functions. 1. To bind together a male husband and a female wife.  The electrical impulses of the neurons and the chemical hormones of the endocrine system work in tandem to establish a strong physiological bonding, which is the organic reason that sex outside of marriage is disastrous. There are emotional and spiritual aspects too, but right now I am talking about God’s physical/biological design for parts that fit together.  2. The other primary function is to procreate children, although that doesn’t play directly into the snarky barb that Buttigieg directed toward Vice President Pence. 

How can Buttigieg, the son of two Notre Dame professors, a Rhodes Scholar, and a magna cum laude graduate of Harvard University miss the answer for, “How could a God of justice and righteousness destroy Sodom and Gomorrah (and Admah, and Zeboiim) for homosexuality if he had made them that way?”   Only by deliberate altering the premise that they were destroyed for the sin of homosexuality.  The LGBT proposes that the cities were destroyed for lack of hospitality, not sharing their wealth with the poor, or some combination thereof.  And according to the history written in The Book of Jasher, “lack of hospitality” is understating it. Feeding the poor was a capital offense, and the judge ordered one woman who gave bread to a destitute traveler to be smeared with honey and placed before a swarm of bees so that she was killed by bee stings!  In the end, excuses on this point do not matter a whole lot because the towns were destroyed after two witnesses went to observe the wickedness, and from Genesis 19:5 we know they observed homosexuality. The iniquity of the the cities was copious enough in all categories that they deserved what they got. 

The main issue is this:  Did the Creator create homosexual persons? 

The answer is: No. Absolutely not. 

So for the rest of this post,  I am going to explain the true origin of homosexuality and why most homosexuals are “made” during their formative years before they reach emotional adulthood, and a few are “born that way.”  Homosexuality goes beyond any physical act, (although that is the way it is consummated.) It reaches to the core of a person’s identity, which is why regular psychology of the mind and emotions cannot “cure” it.  There is always a spiritual component to homosexuality.  It must be addressed in the spiritual.  

There is a spiritual world that parallels Earth’s physical one.  It is inhabited by immortal spirit-beings which the Hebrew bible calls elohim.  God is an immortal spirit, of course, but so are messenger angels that serve under Gabriel, the warring host led by Michael, the guardian cherubim, the 24 elders and the seraphs surrounding the throne of God. They are all elohim. There are  more “species” (for lack of a better word) of elohim; the Bible does not go into great detail. They were created perfect, but some fell from their original appointment.  The Apostle Paul identified some categories of these fallen ones as  principalities, powers,  rulers of the darkness of this world, and spiritual wickedness in the heavenlies.  cf Ephesians 6:12 

The Book of Daniel, Chapter 4, tells of a class of elohim called “Watchers.” The job of Watchers is to observe what happens on Earth and make declarations “to the intent that the living may know that the Most High ruleth in the kingdom of men.” (KJV, v17)  Except for a couple mentions in Daniel 4, the Bible doesn’t say much about the Watchers, but other ancient historical texts do. The Book of Enoch says that long ago,¹ 200 Watchers came down to Mount Hermon.  Watchers were created or assigned to be good observers of life on Earth. These two-hundred, were rebellious. They had observed Earth women and decided to leave the heavenly realm to take some wives. (cf Jude 1:6) They did, and the offspring of immortal fathers and mortal human mothers were Nephilim, the giants.

Notice that the propensities that led to the Watchers’ self-serving sin were (a) sexual and (b) domineering. They took the wives they desired. [As an aside, contrast Eve’s desire for Wisdom, a virtue that Solomon would later be commended for, as the trap that deceived her.] When the fallen elohim set themselves up as the false gods of pagan religions, these two markers would remain throughout human history. It explains why so many satanic cults use deviant sexual rituals or temple prostitutes, and it explains the ungodly control that is exercised over cult members.  

The expression “all hell broke lose” fits pretty well here, even though at this point in Earth’s history they came down, not up. The rebellious Watchers began teaching mankind how to make swords and shields. But knowledge of working with metals and minerals did not stop with weapons of war.  They also made ornamental bracelets and tinctures for cosmetics. Others taught about enchantments, herbs and potions, astrology, other sorts of alchemy, and divination. Some humans began to worship the Watchers as gods so that they could receive more of this occult knowledge.

All the while, the population of Nephilim kept growing. And they required enormous amounts of food.  Some men were enslaved to provide this, but when they could no longer keep up the supply to meet the demand, they were eaten. The giants “began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another’s flesh, and drink the blood.”²  Killing the Nephilim didn’t fully solve the problem. It might keep you from becoming his dinner, but remember, he’s half-immortal and his spirit-half lingers on after death with no place to go. Ancient texts say that this was the source of demons that are still with us; demons are disembodied Nephilim, distinct from their fallen elohim fathers. 

“And there arose much godlessness, and they (humans) committed fornication, and they were led astray, and became corrupt in all their ways.”³  Fornincation here refers to all sexual sins. This is the source of homosexuality. So while it is true that it has been practiced since the earliest times of man, that does not mean it is normal or that God made someone that way.  It was, from its introduction, a practice encouraged by fallen, demonic entities,  and it remains a demonically inspired practice today. 

Once the spiritual origin is recognized as demonic, a lot of other things about homosexuality start making logical connections.  These “unclean spirits” as the Gospel writers called them, can influence, entice, attach to, or fully posses a person. All they need is the slightest opening.  This explains why so many adult homosexuals have a history of sexual abuse occurring during their childhood. Demons can be transferred from one person to another during sexual acts. That’s basic demonology 101, and disbelief in Satan and/or demons won’t make it not true.  

Transfer is not equivalent with possession. Because a demon is a spiritual personality, personal relationships provide a good analogy here:  When you are first introduced to someone, they are an acquaintance; at this stage of demonic transfer, a demon becomes acquainted with you. If you spend more time devoted to that sin, it becomes familiar with you; it is a familiar spirit that hangs out with you and it can transfer thoughts , urges, suggestions and such, but you are still your own person with your own free will. And just as every human friendship develops differently, so does the development of demonic transfer. The analogy cannot be extended indefinitely, however; these are demons, after all.  Eventually the path ends in destruction, perhaps traveling toward obsession, compulsion, and yes, even possession before it ends very badly.  

Most homosexuals became homosexual when a demon was transferred as a result of erotic homosexual contact before or during puberty.  In some cases the child abuse occurred while they were too young to remember or fully understand, and these individuals often feel as if they have “always been that way.”  And while that is the most common way a person become a homosexual, there are at least three other pathways worth mentioning. 

1. Curiosity and consent – this route to homosexuality may not have an overt indication of demonic activity.  It will be there offering an ever-so-subtle enticement, but the person will choose to think about it, and keep thinking about it, and eventually will want to act on those thoughts.  The demon is inclined to stay in the background making the person think “those thoughts” are his own. And after he thinks on them for a while, they do become his.

2. Rebellion against control extremes – it is unusual to develop a propensity toward homosexuality without a homosexual act, but it can happen when there is more than one demon that is influencing a person, and it is very common for demons to travel in packs. A youth who is subjected to an overwhelming imbalance of power in either direction, either excessively domineering or sickeningly passive, can transfer a “I don’t want to be like that person” reaction along gender lines. In these instances, the primary demons gain access first, often as spirits of anger or hatred; the secondary homosexual demon will appear to ‘help’ the person find a release and it is accepted in an attempt to find relief. 

3. Curses – The Western mindset isn’t used to thinking about curses as being real, but again, disbelief doesn’t make it not real.  In the rare cases when a homosexual truly is “born that way,” the demon has gained access through a curse.  There are several kinds of curses which give the demon access to an unborn child through either a direct bloodline or, theoretically, a satanic ritual.   

A satanic ritual can give a demon access to a child who is still in the womb, but I say ‘theoretically’ because I have never heard of an invocation specifically for a homosexual demon like that.  Another kind of curse is a generational curse. It does not have to be invoked; it is just there in the bloodline.  Some sins can be passed on for up to four generations. cf Exodus 20:5. If someone in the child’s bloodline three generations back had a hatred for God that had never been repented of (and know that the second and first generation back would have the authority to break the curse by repenting for their ancestor, because it was a curse upon them as well), that would be a possible access point for a demon.  And there can be unintended curses passed to a baby in utero by the words of his parents.  The baby is a complete human spirit from conception.  Idle words spoken in anger or expressing abandonment by its parents can be picked up in the spirit realm and inadvertently open a gateway. 

God did not create homosexuals.  Homosexuality is a secondary effect in response to an ancient rebellion against God; it has a spiritual root. 

“If me being gay was a choice, it was a choice that was made far, far above my pay grade,” Buttigieg said. “And that’s the thing I wish the Mike Pences of the world would understand. That if you got a problem with who I am, your problem is not with me — your quarrel, sir, is with my creator.”  (CNN) ⁴

No, there is no quarrel with Buttigieg’s Creator because Mayor Pete was never created to be homosexual. A few choose it, but more often homosexuality is perpetrated upon them. Because our Western culture rejects the of the possibility of an unseen realm having a great deal of influence upon sexual preference, many don’t even look there for causes—or for remedies.

So now you know (a) where homosexuality came from and (b) how it can attach to people today, but we have not answered (c) WHY is it a sin, after all, they Love Each Other, don’t they? 

…and that answer is in Romans 1.

Homosexuals surely ‘have feelings’ for each other, but those feelings are not a god-honoring love for each other. They are putting their own desires ahead of their respect for God’s word. Here’s the quote: 

25 For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen.
26 For this reason God gave them over to degrading passions; for their women exchanged the natural function for that which is unnatural, 27 and in the same way also the men abandoned the natural function of the woman and burned in their desire toward one another, men with men committing indecent acts and receiving in their own persons the due penalty of their error. […] 32 and although they know the ordinance of God, that those who practice such things are worthy of death, they not only do the same, but also give hearty approval to those who practice them.

There you have it.  Homosexuality is self-serving; it does not serve the Creator’s purpose for mankind.  God is more than miffed about such an affront, and He gives them over to dishonorable passions, or as the King James puts it, to vile affections. 

You can read the entire first chapter of Romans if you wish. I cherry-picked the four verses that best laid it out, simply to conserve space.  It is not the Mike Penses of this world who have a quarrel with the Creator of it.  It is the Pete Buttigiegs of the world who do not see fit to acknowledge God’s word any longer.



¹ The time is indefinite, but roughly five centuries after Adam and Eve were kicked out of the Garden some of the effects caused by Nephilim start showing up. 

² Enoch 7:5

³ Enoch 8:2


Bonus Video for further study — 




Apparently the New World Order Puppet-Masters have coronated the next Democrat Party nominee for the 2020 Presidential election: Pete Buttigieg.   This should be interesting…  I have many dots to connect here.  Unlike regular news that prints propaganda and an occasional fact, this post is an attempt to partially explain the warfare of the unseen spiritual realm.

First, an introduction to “Mayor Pete,” South Bend, Indiana,  Mayor Pete Buttigieg.  You are reading this in print, and you cannot escape the ‘Butt’ joke in his last name, of course, the u is pronounced as “Ooo!”  I find this diabolically ingenious—almost as if he were born for this.  On soundbites the initial “Boo” syllable slides right on by as a normal speech sound,  but in the silence of print Lucifer laughs at his stooge, Peter Buttigieg.

The craftiness of the devil hasn’t been all that hard to discern, so far. He led off with a plethora of crazies, so many that they could be easily reduced to social white noise at the ripe time: Elizabeth Warren’s Pocahontas alter has been her disqualifer; no one likes a Harvard law school professor to lie about her credentials. Bernie Sanders entered already hamstrung  by the Clinton machine. Joe Biden, aka “Creepy Uncle Joe” is not going to be a vote-magnet because too many people have scary childhood memories they will project on him and reject his candidacy.  I could go on, but I do not need to. The suddenness of coagulating talking points in the media clearly points to Mayor Pete ascending to Satan’s Step-Two of the scheme to socialize America.

Mayor Pete is not concerned about the Boomers, and probably won’t even try fake appeasement until he’s desperate.  Of course, anyone competitively taking on Mr. Trump will eventually run into desperation. Hillary did.   But so far Mayor Pete’s speeches have implied that anyone older than 40 has screwed over their kid’s ability to achieve wealth. The exact quote is, “If nothing changes economically, we’ll be the first generation to make less than our parents.”  (Interview S Cobert)  Right out of the gate he’s flirting with breaking one of the Ten Commandments that is reprinted in the New Testament as Ephesians 6:2, “Honor your father and mother.”

[To explain warfare in the supernatural realm I primarily use the Holy Bible, and occasionally the Book of Enoch or the Apocrypha, as a baseline. Buttigieg’s political positions are also in rebellion against biblical teaching on the environment, the sovereignty of nations, and the directives for sexual relationships, but the focus of this post will be much narrower.]

So let’s Get on with it…

I am going to stick to Buttigieg’s coverage in this April 3 article by Jilio Rosas  on mediaite.com

Beginning with the headline:¹

Mayor Buttigieg: It’s Hard to Look at Trump’s Actions and Think He Believes in God

To see the spiritual warfare, statements like this need to be reverse engineered. I am not concerned about what Buttigieg thinks of Trump, I am looking for how he thinks about God.

But right away, the article starts quoting CNN’s Kirsten Powers writing in USA Today, so we have to go there for a bit. This is where Buttigieg argues that, “Christian faith is going to point you in a progressive direction.” 

No, Pete, it does not.  Allow me to prove it.

Despite the partisan pettiness, progressives like to project the idea that “we” are all in this together. “We” all need to get along because “we” have a duty to the poor and disadvantaged, “We” need to save the environment. “We” all need single payer healthcare. “We” need heavy public investment in free and accessible education.

Christianity does not point in any of those directions.  It does not point to public education; that was the responsibility of parents, and in practical application during Jesus’ life on Earth, boys would attend the local synagogue school from age seven until their bar mitzvah at age 13. No issue of separation of church and state either! Healthcare was not a role for government. As for care of the environment, the earth is a creation of the Lord’s, not a result of evolution. Landowners were supposed to be stewards of their natural resources as caretakers of the earth, and what we now refer to as “natural” disasters were to be avoided by removing sin from the land. That may not sound too “scientific” to our modern Western minds, but…  here is a link to the connection that defies coincidence between horrific weather and messing with Israel’s land.

Progressives support Freedom, but their definition is alien to Christianity.  They want a woman to have “freedom” to chose abortion; Jesus said that He came “to proclaim deliverance to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to release the oppressed.”  Freedom from the curse of the law, from death itself, is not likely to point you in a progressive direction.  One clear distinction needs to be made: The Bill of Rights enumerates rights. It gives Americans the rights to specific freedoms. Progressive speech writers often blur rights and freedoms. The difference between that right-to-freedom and that of Christianity is determined by who bestows it. For Progressives, legislators vote on your freedoms, but Christianity aligns with the Declaration of Independence and recognizes that inalienable rights are bestowed by one’s Creator.  That is not pointing Christians in a “progressive direction.”  John 8:36 encapsulates the freedom from Christ:  So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.

Yet another reason that Mayor Pete is just plain heretical when he asserts that “Christian faith is going to point you in a progressive direction,” is in the conflicting progressive view of “Opportunity.”

    [T]he concept of opportunity has two components: one focuses on political equality and the other on economic and social arrangements that enhance our lives. The first component of opportunity prohibits discrimination against anyone based on race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religious faith or non-faith or disability. It also embraces the diversity of American society by ensuring all people—not just the rich and powerful or dominant racial and ethnic groups—have the chance to turn their talents and ambitions into a meaningful life. The second component of opportunity involves the conditions necessary for people to be secure and move up in life—health care, education, a decent job, labor rights, a secure retirement.²

Biblical Christianity not only distinguishes between male and female, Romans 1:24-27 plainly states what God thinks of “unnatural, degrading passions.” And—News Flash—God is not all that concerned about your secure retirement. He has his own plans for your life, assignments and appointments for your service to Him. The Christian faith is not about securely moving up in status; it is about the Kingdom of the Lord.  “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth…” Ring any bells?  It should. The Lord’s Prayer is not a progressive manifesto.  The life-goals for a Christian servant have little resemblance to the goals of a progressive: Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.³

Progressives like Mayor Pete are for decent paying jobs and benefits for workers.  Those programs cost money, (read taxes,) so before I switch from showing why Bittigieg’s version of Christianity is false and get to my “real” topic of Spiritual Warfare, let me add a bit about God’s economics.  He originated the tithe. The tithe is a 10% tax rate, proportional for everyone. In God’s house, 10% is enough to maintain the infrastructure, pay the priests, feed he sheep, and care for the poor.  Progressives like (♫ ta da!) “progressive” tax rates where some pay more than others. Christian faith is NOT going to point you in a progressive direction when it comes to taxes. Christian faith is going to point you toward proportional taxes limited to real needs, not pork, certainly not pork!

And now…

The Bad Judgment of Mayor Pete

Here is a man (Buttigieg) who does not know what biblical Christianity is, but has pursued a strawman version of what he thinks a Christian should be: an apologetic, modest-mouthed, self-effacing, and differential dork. Buttigieg has No Clue who Jesus is. Jesus is the Lion of a Tribe! He is the King of Kings.  Jesus has power and authority that he gives to men whom he can trust with it. Donald Trump is one of those men.

Let’s unpack this line by line.  Buttigieg’s quotes from the article are in italic.

…it is hard to look at the actions of President Donald Trump and think he believes in God.   Dude! It is hard to see how anyone who did not believe in God could withstand the 24/7/52 attacks!  The very fact that he is still here, unwavering, accomplishing things in the face of relentless spiritual onslaught ought to be proof that He not only believes, but has strong belief!

“I’m reluctant to comment on another person’s faith, but… Sure you are. You’re not only reluctant, but are too humble to presume to judge.  (eyeroll of hypocrisy)

“I just don’t understand how you can be as worshipful of your own self as he is and be prepared to humble yourself before God. I’ve never seen him humble himself before anyone. And the exaltation of yourself, especially a self that’s about wealth and power, could not be more at odds with at least my understanding of the teachings of the Christian faith.”  Okay, I have already covered how Buttigieg’s “understanding of the teachings of the Christian faith” are lacking, so we do not have to cover that again. Beyond that, (a) it is unrealistic to expect to see a President’s private conversations with God. His other expectations of Christianity indicate that he lacks discernment to know Trump’s heart. This is spiritual blindness. And (b) he’s probably revealed more about his own thoughts on wealth and power than he meant to; he is uncomfortable with Trump’s open candor. That’s a red flag for activity in the unseen realm; when people are uncomfortable with plain-spokeness, it it time to rev up your spidey-sense.

“Buttigieg also criticized conservatives ‘saying so much about what Christ said so little about, and so little about what he said so much about,’ like how the issue of abortion has become a litmus test.”   Okay, there are several counter arguments for this. Historically, the Jews were not doing abortions at this time. It was one of the things that separated their identity from the surrounding cultures. Gospel writers had a wealth of material to cover and John said a lot was left out.  It cannot be considered approval for abortion simply because we do not have a record of Jesus condemning it.  Separately, the Christian view of a biologically unique person, a spiritual being with a soul made in the image of God, and whose life-plan is on record in the heavenly books, cf Psalm 139, actually does make a good litmus test.  Giving a woman who self-admits that she won’t care for her own offspring the authority to kill it is empowering the crazies.

“I think it’s unfortunate [the Democratic Party] has lost touch with a religious tradition that I think can help explain and relate our values. At least in my interpretation, it helps to root [in religion] a lot of what it is we do believe in when it comes to protecting the sick and the stranger and the poor, as well as skepticism of the wealthy and the powerful and the established.” The words religious tradition stick out.  What is this ‘religious’ tradition of ‘government?’  Do governments have religious traditions? Monarchies often do, but for eight years of Obama the mantra was that America was never a Christian nation—so somebody needs to get the Democrat’s story straight. Traditionally, the sick, the stranger, and the poor were helped by families in the local community, not by government, and government was not actively shipping in poor, sick strangers either! I cannot find much logic to Buttigieg’s “reasoning.”  Also resurfacing is his “skepticism of the wealthy and the powerful and the established.”  Okay, he hates Trump, we get that. But there is an underlying jealous darkness that is greater than merely trying to politically separate himself from a rich establishment. Besides, Trump never was and never will be establishment, so is this an attempt to distance himself from being identified with rich Democrats?   It is hard to tell who Buttigieg is playing to here, and that does not instill trust because it smacks of trying to control a hidden narrative.

I would say it is hard to look at this president’s actions and believe that they’re the actions of somebody who believes in God.   One of the ‘markers’ of an unseen spirit’s influence is hypocrisy.  Generally, the easier it rolls off the tongue, the more comfortable the hypocritical person is with it; over time the conscience is seared over and cauterized to a point that he/she cannot see the anomaly of the statement. Maybe Buttigieg did not offer an example, or maybe his interviewer neglected to ask…  whatever, the article did not name a specific action that made Buttigieg doubt Trump’s belief in God.

Meanwhile, the article provided a trifecta of actions to make the reader doubt Buttigieg’s commitment to biblical Christianity.  1. He is pro-abortion, 2. he is gay, and 3. he made snarly and unloving statements.  Yes, I must say, it is hard to look at his actions and believe that they’re the actions of somebody who believes in the Christian God.


¹  ://outline.com/jYpeeE

² Yates, A, and A Bartley. “Progressive Thinking.” Scribd, American Values Project, 2016, http://www.scribd.com/document/131793272/Progressive-Thinking.

³ Westminster Shorter Catechism

https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a26985815/pete-buttigieg-presidential-election-2020-issues/  (not quoted but used for background)

Q Did This.

Q did this. Q got me blogging on Word Press again. I pretty much stopped blogging here when Word Press started putting in ads and making me pay to get rid of them—like that was going to happen.
But today, no one was asking the questions that I wanted to answer. So I figured out how to reset my long-forgotten password and we shall see how this goes.

RE: Q drop #2925
Selected sections in edited into normal English.
The declassification of documents produced under the The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act will provide the facts necessary to demonstrate that the US government, under the direction of the Obama White House, knowing presented false evidence to The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court.

It is commonly called the FISA Court, the initials for the Act that created it.  This is a special court that exists only for FOREIGN Intelligence… except when it doesn’t.   Like when it was used to rig an election.  But back to Q in normal English: 

The false evidence was presented to the FISA Court in an effort to get a warrant to spy and collect wide ranging intelligence for one purpose, and one purpose only: to influence the 2016 Presidential Election. 

Obama had timed out his term limits. The Democrats had decided that Hillary Clinton would be carrying on his legacy policies. They (Obama, Hillary, and the Democrats—as represented by the DNC) needed to safeguard against any possible loss of power.  And that is when, like the Leviathans that they are, they decide that since it is clearly illegal for the government to spy on one presidential candidate for the benefit of the other presidential candidate, they could get foreign agents to do the spying for them. Problem Solved!

And THAT is why Obama and Hillary used a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance court. The way the warrants issued by a FISA court work is this: Obtain a warrant for Person-of-Interest “A,” and everyone “A” contacts can also be surveiled, have their emails read, and be otherwise spied on.  All they really had to do was get one mole working for the Trump campaign, have that mole take a “suspicious” meeting overseas, and then the FISA court warrant allows then to use government resources to spy on everyone that the mole has contacts with.

Q predicts that declassifying these FISA documents will immediately make the public aware of who signed off on them and the resulting investigations will cause Rod Rosenstein, Deputy Attorney General, to recuse himself from the investigation of President Trump, and possibly to resign completely or be removed/fired. It is also believed that a declassification will quickly implicate John Brennan, Director of the CIA during most of Obama’s second term, and James Clapper, the Director of National Intelligence under Obama.  Now, if that just sounds like a list of names of guys who head up national agencies, you have missed the main point: if these guy are involved, then it means that there was a coordinated effort within the Obama White House to rig the 2016 election.

Donald J Trump said that it was rigged from the get-go, and many made fun of it and/or called him a liar because he did not offer proof.  It turns out that the definitive unarguable proof was all classified.  And that means two things.  (1) He would have had to break the law by releasing classified information to defend himself. It is not like he could trust a corrupt FBI that had done double flips to exonerate Hillary and her State Department for “generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information found elsewhere in the government” to make an honest investigation. And (2) since it was classified, had Hillary been elected, it would have stayed classified and only the guilty players would have known.

One of news stories of the past week was about a rodeo clown who wore an Obama mask as part of his gig. Considering the rich history of political satire that has always been a part of American culture, one would think this was not such a big deal. For three nights, the crowds cheered and life was set to continue on. But then Perry Beam posted his embarrassment on Facebook about how bull-chasing in effigy made Americans look bad to his Taiwanese exchange student, and someone gave him a microphone. Suddenly, what is essentially a free speech and political satire issue became falsely charged as RACIST! Resignations ensued, the clown has been banned from the venue for life, the Lt. Governor got air time, and the bull hit the mainstream media’s fans.
There is silence from the normally glib White House. Coupled with last year’s “Trayvon could have been my son,” rhetoric, it is now clear to anyone with half a brain that Obama relishes it when people use race as a distraction. Exploiting his ethnicity is one of the few things he does well. Whereas a leader of good character would have wanted to discard the race card as quickly as possible, Obama has chosen to leave it in play. And THAT is how all this relates back to Benghazi.
If Benghazi is a phony scandal, as proved by no one being fired; if Fast and Furious was a phony scandal, as proved by AG Holder retaining his job; if the IRS targeting was a tiny incident contained in Cincinnati, as proved by Lois Learner’s continued collection of pay while on administrative leave; if the deaths of SEAL Team 6 and others is not a scandal, as proved by no reprimand when Biden painted a target on them; then surely the rodeo incident is a REAL SCANDAL because people are losing jobs. That is how the logic works. Isn’t it? At least that is how the racism exploiter Obama rationalized it.
You hypocrite, first take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of the rodeo clown’s eye. (Paraphrased from Matthew 7:5)
It is the real scandals the President dismisses as phony, not racism, that are the reasons the crowd cheered. The cure is not to restrict the First Amendment Right to Free Speech. The cure is to stop doing scandalous things.

Two hundred and thirty-seven years ago, a few good men made the irrevocable decision to overthrow the tyrannical king from his authority on American soil. Declaration of Indp Comm That is how it started. This Fourth of July I am hearing a lot more chatter about whether it is now time for the overthrow of another tyrant.
Taking a cue from and quoting the Declaration of Independence, “a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them.” It is a good idea to make a list and put it in writing. The Declaration of Independence listed over two dozen impelling causes.

This then, is my first Declaration of an Impelling Cause: Bad company corrupts.

I will begin by listing those persons with whom the President has chosen to surround himself. One can tell a lot about a tyrant by looking at his advisors.

Secretary of Energy Steven Chu, mastermind of the infamous Solyndra scandal, awarded 80% of the 20.5 Billion guaranteed “green energy” funding to Obama’s financial backers. Here is the dumbed down version for those of you who find politics boring: Hey, give me a lot of money, and when I win I will pay you back with what we collect from the taxpayers.

Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, whom William Safire once called a “congenital liar,” (and not without reason,) has since mismanaged security in Benghazi and took a “what difference does it make” attitude. It is hard to know exactly what she was thinking, but she seems to have both armed and destabilized the Mideast. Perhaps Vince Foster could have explained how she thinks, but then, oh yeah, mysteriously he is dead.

Secretary of State, John Kerry — I’m sorry, I am having a hard time getting past his Vietnam-era persona. I figured that since he is one of Obama’s cabinet members who has an important place in world affairs, I really ought to find out more about his current actions. My search results turned up this: “Kerry waits out Egyptian crisis on private yacht.” This might actually be an improvement over Hillary; at least he is not sending women’s rights in the Mideast backwards in time.

UN Ambassador “it was the YouTube that did it” Susan Rice, has now been promoted to national security advisor. In between then and now, she had to withdraw from consideration for Secretary of State. My gut tells me there is more to the story, but I certainly do not have the know-how or the contacts to pursue it. The part that is evident is that Ms. Rice is willing to tell and defend the most cockamamie of lies.

Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius, who was found guilty of violating the Hatch Act, used her official position to campaign, gave an “Oops!” excuse, and went on like it was nothing.

Department of Homeland Security Secretary, Janet Napolitano, who has overseen a department riddled with sex scandals, also has an issue with bullets. When questioned about the purchase, she repeatedly stonewalled Congress before coming up with the excuse that it is cheaper to buy in bulk. No one really seems to know how much bulk that is. Estimates start with a low of 250 million rounds for “actual operations” in one year and go to a high in excess of 6 billion for “stockpiling” since she has been in office. Whatever the actual number, it was great enough to cause shortages at sporting goods stores across the nation. It is worth noting that most were hollow points that cost nearly twice as much as regular bullets, which raises questions about her “need to be cost-effective” explanation. She has yet to give an honest explanation about why she wants so many of them.

Secretary of Education Arne Duncan’s ‘technically criminal’ list pales in comparison with some other cabinet members, although it is not hard to find allegations of pressuring teachers to change grades to “help” get the children of VIPs into the right prep school. His greater crime is his rabid support of Common Core. Ten days ago, the Washington Post reported that he was now telling reporters what to say in their stories. Sold as voluntary, “coerced” is the more accurate word for this program that got both its seed-money and it philosophical point of view (i.e. globalist) from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. To get federal money, states had to agree to Common Core standards without first being able to read the final version—does that sound like Obamacare, or what?
By 2015, all Title I funding will be linked to using Common Core. States may add up to 15% supplemental curriculum, but may not subtract any. It is realistic to presume that once it is fully implemented, the curriculum will be updated to reflect “new knowledge.” The curriculum is copyrighted by private organizations that do not answer to either parents or elected school boards.

Attorney General Eric Holder’s sins, in no particular order, run the gamut across Fast and Furious gun-running, profiting from abortions, drug trafficking, cronyism, persecution of homeschoolers, a citation for contempt of Congress, hypocrisy, and implementing policies that resulted in murder. Perhaps most telling of all is that last year the President invoked executive privilege to prevent the release of documents that would most likely have proven they both have blood on their hands. So for now. the hard proof is reduced to the level of educated guesses.

The president likes to surround himself with people who can get away with outrageous atrocities.

In this video clip of Obama in Turkey, he stumbles through a speech that could make an ostrich proud.


It is no secret that at heart, Barack Obama’s allegiance is more Global than American. Given that fact, I don’t know who the President thinks he is fooling when he mixes religion and politics. Maybe it is because of his early training that he has such a difficult time getting his head around the facts. Happily, the President now fools very few people when he mixes his religion and politics. It is ludicrous to run around using the term “Christian” the way he does, and all thinking Americans are smart enough to figure that out. Real Americans generally do not mix religion and politics the way Obama does.

By “affiliation” (which is the only real way to view religion politically, since no one can accurately judge an individual’s heart) we are indeed a Christian nation.

Evangelical Protestant Churches – 26.3%
Mainline Protestant Churches – 18.1%
Catholic 23.9%
Historically Black Churches – 6.9%
Mormon – 1.7%
Jehovah’s Witness – 0.7%
Other self-identified (chiefly metaphysical) – 0.3%

Total percentage of US adults who would claim a “Christian affiliation” is 77.9%

Unaffiliated – 16.1%
Jewish – 1.7%
Buddhist – 0.7%
Muslim – 0.6%
Hindu, Unitarian, New Age, and Native American are equal to or all less than 0.4% each.

Obama could claim that we are politically secular, because there are truly aggressive attempts made to separate church and state, but to deny the nation’s Christian affiliation is the ostrich’s approach—head in the sand. ostrich

Also worth noting is that the Muslim percentage was not broken down into categories the way Christian affiliation was. This has the potential to be misleading. Islam is not homogenous. There are Sunnis and there are Shiites. There are tensions, major tensions, between the two groups. Again, the President seems to play ostrich about this when it comes to his domestic policy. So when, as he did this past week, he travels to Ireland and makes a speech that calls their parochial schools as much an obstacle to peace as racial segregation, he portrays himself as a hypocritical, propagandizing fool.

When Americans follow the leader and put their heads in the sand too… well, think about what is left on display.

Source: The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. All statistics retrieved from http://religions.pewforum.org/affiliations

Dear Speaker Boehner:

You called him a traitor, but if YOU had been doing your job, sir, Edward Snowden would not have felt compelled to expose the warrantless surveillance and data-mining.

It has been reported that the NSA is downloading 1 trillion communications on the Internet per month.

Let me tell you what a TRILLION is:
A million seconds is just under 12 days. A billion seconds is 31 years. A trillion seconds is 31,688 years.

How can you possibly think NSA’s actions are Constitutional?

Let me tell you what the Constitution says:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

We learned that the NSA is systematically monitoring the Internet posts and telephone conversations of U.S. citizens.

Your defense of this spying was that 9 out of 10 people in the briefing room were lawyers. ARE YOU STONED? Having to have even ONE lawyer in the room ought to be a BIG warning sign that something may be sketchy. Ninety percent is Red Alert!

Your job is NOT to “work together” to destroy America. It is NOT your job to do the apologetics for a President who has no fear of God. YOUR job is to be the CHECK and the BALANCE. You are supposed to be calling for an investigation of the Benghazi lies and asking for resignations. Your job is to question the three Generals and an Admiral who were fired by Obama in the wake of it all. Your job is to demand that the IRS is fully vetted. Your job is to shred the funding of Obamacare. Your job is to support a pro-job tax system. Your job is to open a serious look at the many, many questions about Obama’s passport, social security number, selective service papers, school funding, and birth certificate and end that scandal with a fully transparent Congressional Investigation. Your job is to strengthen America, not dilute it by refusing to guard her border and deport criminals.
But instead, your knuckle-dragging, kowtowing, Republican leadership has aided and abetted the destruction of any responsible representation of the people in American government.

The real traitor is the person you see in the mirror, not Edward Snowden.

Swan Songs


This past week, Michael Savage, the Savage of the “Savage Nation” radio show, published a poem on his website.

The teflon swan

The teflon swan spoke. The right-wing fever broke.

Scandals come and scandals go. The vandals sail through the gates.

“Too smooth, too cool to be guilty,” say the ducks as the swan swam on.


Savage’s on-air comments made it very clear that the swan is President Obama. After overcoming my shock that such a progressive swan could even have a right wing, (I’d assumed it had been amputated at Columbia, along with the rest of his records,) I rebelled against Savage’s portrayal of cygnus behaviors. “Too cool” is a description that is for the birds; it is as bad as my intended pun. I have responded with a poem of my own—

Swans do not make silky speeches.

They are Loud. Aggressive. Trumpeters.

Trumpeting and Neck-bobbing,

they establish their territory;

Intolerant of competition in their nesting area,

they will kill.

Observed an interval apart,

they convey a sense of peace, an exotic beauty.

Swan sham! It is a ruse.

Affronted, their wings beat a flurry of crosswinds.

Pecking, preying, flapping, fighting

they out-compete the native birds.

Although young cygnets begin life fairly low on the food chain, once the swans mature to flight stage they survive most natural predators. It is not because they are smooth, cool, or admired, however. It is because when they are offended, they flap their wings to make themselves look larger. They peck and bite, their long necks giving them the advantage of extended reach. Swans are such defensive fighters that many golf courses will buy a pair of swans for their water hazards simply to help keep the Canadian geese away.
Perhaps Dr. Savage was showing how those who heard the speeches were so mesmerized they’d ‘duck’ their duty. That is a possibility. But I am inclined to believe the swan swims on because of intimidation most fowl.

Source links
Swan Song (2010) Thumbnail of painting by Rachel Rolseth, http://rachelrolseth.com/
The Teflon Swan (2013) Poem by Michael Savage, http://www.michaelsavage.wnd.com/2013/05/the-teflon-swan/
Research on swan behavior:
Metroparks Zoo, http://www.clemetzoo.com/rttw/swan/behavior.htm
Newton, http://www.newton.dep.anl.gov/askasci/zoo00/zoo00240.htm


In a statement about the tyranny of the Internal Revenue Service, Obama declared that “Americans have a right to be angry about it, and I’m angry about it.”


This is BIG NEWS. The head of the Executive Branch has announced that there is a Right to be Angry.  Will someone please let me know where this is codified? The Federal Government usually uses the Commerce Clause of the Constitution to justify rights that were not previously enumerated, so does this mean that my right to be angry applies only to someone across the state line?


Will someone please tell me if this is a natural right or a fundamental right? Apparently not all rights are equal rights, and I am struggling to understand how the right to be angry could be politically correct. Yet, simple deductive logic would show it must be a PC right because none other than Mr. Obama himself has said so.


I am glad to see the President is exercising his right to anger. This will go a long way in modifying the stodgy old mores of society.  Not that long ago, only radical groups and inner city gangs routinely displayed anger in public. I am sure that with the President’s endorsement of such a powerful emotion, the Untied States will flourish. (BTW, there is no spelling error in that last sentence.) Soon, folks everywhere will be angrier than ever before.


In the past, many people bad-mouthed the God of the Old Testament for using lightning, thundering, earthquakes, plagues, and other displays of anger.  At long last, the President is ruling with a rod of irony.

The Washoe County Social Services Department, Nevada, wants to (a) murder a baby, (b) impose additional psychological distress on a mentally challenged woman, (c) interfere with a court-approved adult guardianship, and (d) defy the American right to the pursuit of happiness by obstructing all opportunity for providing a child to an adoptive couple. They want a judge to force a 32-year-old woman to have an abortion against her wishes.

What would you call someone who claims that woman ought to have the right to decide about her own body parts without the government telling her what to do, and then turns around and tries to get a judge to order an abortion? I would call her a REPROBATE!

Prenatal protocol for high-risk pregnancies is being followed, and there is a waiting list of couples who want to adopt. Social Services has its panties in a wad because the baby was exposed to anti-epileptic medication. They have absolutely no proof that the baby has been harmed—only suspicions. They are wasting resources and causing problems where no problem that they are qualified to solve even existed.

Whoever the person was that decided to stick her nose into this family’s private business ought to have her nose cut off. That appendage is only a tiny fraction of the body parts she wants to remove from the baby.

Grab your barf bag and then read the story here: LifeNews.com