Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘child protective services’

The Washoe County Social Services Department, Nevada, wants to (a) murder a baby, (b) impose additional psychological distress on a mentally challenged woman, (c) interfere with a court-approved adult guardianship, and (d) defy the American right to the pursuit of happiness by obstructing all opportunity for providing a child to an adoptive couple. They want a judge to force a 32-year-old woman to have an abortion against her wishes.

What would you call someone who claims that woman ought to have the right to decide about her own body parts without the government telling her what to do, and then turns around and tries to get a judge to order an abortion? I would call her a REPROBATE!

Prenatal protocol for high-risk pregnancies is being followed, and there is a waiting list of couples who want to adopt. Social Services has its panties in a wad because the baby was exposed to anti-epileptic medication. They have absolutely no proof that the baby has been harmed—only suspicions. They are wasting resources and causing problems where no problem that they are qualified to solve even existed.

Whoever the person was that decided to stick her nose into this family’s private business ought to have her nose cut off. That appendage is only a tiny fraction of the body parts she wants to remove from the baby.

Grab your barf bag and then read the story here: LifeNews.com

Read Full Post »

DFCS, the Division of Family and Children Services, is awash in what the Bible calls strongholds. A stronghold is an incorrect thinking pattern that has molded itself into a warped and perverted worldview. Strongholds are either rooted in or fabricated from deception and error.

Some beliefs start right, but then mix in error. For example, many social workers begin with a heart-desire to help others, but then they mix in unbiblical ideas from humanist psychology. When confronted with a Bible verse like Proverbs 23:14 (You shall beat him with the rod, and shall deliver his soul from death), they will say that God was wrong. Other “child savers” start off with a wrong foundation. Perhaps they were abused as children themselves, and now they are driven by a neurotic need to get even. This unforgiveness makes them vulnerable, and many are deceived by demon spirits.

No matter what the source, these strongholds govern a person’s reactions to daily situations.

Many parents who are falsely accused of child abuse find that trying to work with DFCS is like hitting a brick wall. When one encounters a social worker who is inflexible and irrational to the point that he or she is blind to the truth—or even to the possibility of a parent’s innocence, it is almost certain that a demonic stronghold exists and is exerting control over the situation.

How Does Satan Build a Stronghold?
Every stronghold has a foundation in sin. Satan still uses much the same technique as is recorded in the Genesis account of the original sin in the Garden of Eden. First he plants an appealing idea in a social worker’s mind. It might be, “You are overwhelmed with work! Just put down a little white lie in the report so you can finish faster. It takes too long to substantiate everything, and besides, if it is not true, they probably did something just as bad or worse when it wasn’t reported! It will all balance out.” Or maybe he tells them, “You know this child is probably safe with its parents, so it won’t really hurt anything to keep the case open a bit so that you can show that your department needs more funding. If you have a lot of extra cases, you can ask for a raise.” Or maybe Satan says, “You know in your gut that these parents are bad, even though you don’t have any actual proof. Just exaggerate a little in your report so that they won’t get away with it!”

It does not really matter how Satan spins it, all he has to do is to get the social worker to lie a little on a report. Then he can use their sin to build his stronghold. And if the devil cannot entice the social workers to lie, he can get them to listen to and participate in gossip. Gossip, slander and perjury are all sins. Gossip repeats rumors without facts. Slander is using false charges or even misrepresentations which defame and damage another person’s reputation. Perjury is lying under oath, but it also includes lying on official reports made “in the line of duty.”

Satan uses these to build a stronghold where DFCS promotes unbiblical doctrines and stirs up evil suspicions.

Why DFCS Workers Come Off As Being Haughty
3 If anyone teaches a different doctrine, and doesn’t consent to sound words, the words of our Lord, Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; 4 he is conceited, knowing nothing, but obsessed with arguments, disputes, and word battles, from which come envy, strife, reviling, evil suspicions, 5 constant friction of men of corrupt minds and destitute of the truth.
1 Timothy 6:3-5.
They come off as haughty because they are conceited as pertains to a doctrine other than the Bible and the teachings of Jesus. They are like the Pharisees, believing they know best.

Can the Strongholds Be Pulled Down?
They could be, if DFCS was willing to repent of their lies. But DFCS is addicted to the empowerment that they derive from their warped and twisted doctrine. Every day that they participate in gossip, slander, perjury, and lies, they give Satan the right to stick around and spread more deception. Furthermore, may judges grant them immunity for many of the lies. There is no natural way to pull down these strongholds. It is tough enough to pull down a stronghold in one’s own life when there is a desire to be rid of it. That is done by casting down imaginations, and every high thing that exalts itself against the knowledge of God, (see Ephesians 6). Until DFCS repents or Divine Judgment falls, their core demonic strongholds will remain.

Many people will be very shocked on Judgment Day when their eyes are opened into the spirit realm and they see that DFCS has been run by a horde of what some might call ‘Jezebel’ and ‘Feminist’ spirits that specialize in witchcraft. Witchcraft, at its root, is not about a cauldron of foul-smelling potion. Witchcraft is about using power that was not delegated by God to control the lives of others.

Read Full Post »

[♦[♦[ Part of the series on How opposes the Teachings of Christ ]♦]♦]

“He who is not with Me is against Me; and he who does not gather with Me, scatters.
Luke 11:23

Child Protective Services does not gather with God. I guess you could call them scatterbrained. The Message Bible cuts to the chase on this verse: “This is war, and there is no neutral ground. If you’re not on my side, you’re the enemy; if you’re not helping, you’re making things worse.” CPS certainly qualifies as having the heart and brain of a scatterer who makes things worse.

I am now 30 posts into this area of study. I had intended to go through all four gospels and document everything that jumped out at me in regard to CPS being in opposition to the teaching of Jesus. It is time for a radical change in the process.

CPS is bad because its foundations are wrong. There is no point in trying to reform it. It does not support God’s rules for child rearing, therefore it is anti-God and an antichrist. It does not gather families in a redemptive, gracious approach but scatters them.

Child custody cases constitute at least a third, and in some jurisdictions half of all civil litigation. (Alvare) Can you say “Love of Money?” This provides work not only for the obvious lawyers, judges and courthouse staffing, but also for psychotherapists, mediators, counselors, social workers, daycare centers, and more.

(F)amily dissolution breeds a host of societal ills for government to solve. Virtually every major social pathology, from violent crime to drug abuse to truancy, is directly attributable to family breakdown and fatherless homes more than any single factor, surpassing race and poverty.
(Blankenhorn)

Every time CPS damages a family, they broaden the breeding ground for social pathologies. The utensils they use are right out of the devil’s toolbox: Lies, deception, and fear.

CPS is heavily infiltrated by two closely related spirits: radical feminism and witchcraft. Radical feminism is generally understood. Witchcraft needs to be defined, however, because I am not talking about a Harry Potter fantasy. Witchcraft, in its basic definition, pertains to power that is not given or delegated by God which is used to control another person. It is the use of illegitimate authority to manipulate another person.

I am changing the focus of this Bible study series to explore this area more fully. Future posts will follow a different format.

________________________________________
THE MESSAGE: The Bible in Contemporary Language Originally published by NavPress in English as THE MESSAGE: The Bible in Contemporary Language Copyright © 2002 by Eugene Peterson.

Alvare, Helen. “Types and Styles of Family Proceedings,” Report of the United States to the XII World Congress, International Association of Procedural Law, 2003.

Blankenhorn, David. Fatherless America, 1996; ISBN-13: 978-0060926830

Read Full Post »

[♦[♦[ Part of the series on How Child Protective Services opposes the Teachings of Christ ]♦]♦]

5 But Jesus said unto them, For your hardness of heart he wrote you this commandment. 6 But from the beginning of the creation, Male and female made he them. 7 For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife; 8 and the twain shall become one flesh: so that they are no more twain, but one flesh. 9 What therefore God hath joined together, let not man put asunder.
Mark 10:5-9

This is an obvious one today folks! CPS often encourages divorce. In fact, ripping families asunder and pitting one parent against another is Standard Operating Procedure.

I heard a socialworker claim that putting one person against the other helps him “get to the truth.” He is a degenerate idiot.

Read Full Post »

[♦[♦[ Part of the series on How Child Protective Services opposes the Teachings of Christ ]♦]♦]

14 And he called the people to him again and said to them, “Hear me, all of you, and understand: 15 There is nothing outside a person that by going into him can defile him, but the things that come out of a person are what defile him.” 17 And when he had entered the house and left the people, his disciples asked him about the parable. 18 And he said to them, “Then are you also without understanding? Do you not see that whatever goes into a person from outside cannot defile him, 19 since it enters not his heart but his stomach, and is expelled?” (Thus he declared all foods clean.) 20 And he said, “What comes out of a person is what defiles him. 21 For from within, out of the heart of man, come evil thoughts, sexual immorality, thefts, murders, adulteries, 22 greedy desires, wickedness, deceit, sensuality, an evil eye, slander, pride, foolishness. 23 All these evil things come from within, and they defile a person.”
Mark 7:14-23

CPS totally misses the point that Jesus teaches here. And it is not surprising that they do because they are always looking for evil in others, never in themselves. They think finding evil in others makes them good! I am serious.

In my experience, what comes from the heart of CPS is false accusations and lies. They think the worst of others, they slander them in their investigations and reports, they are greedy to prosecute, they are full of pride, and they make some of the most foolish decisions of any professional vocation ever.

Read Full Post »

[♦[♦[ Part of the series on How Child Protective Services opposes the Teachings of Christ ]♦]♦]

23 And it happened that he was going through the grainfields on the Sabbath, and as they made their way, his disciples began to pluck heads of grain. 24 And the Pharisees were saying to him, “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?”  
Mark 2:23,24


I have included this because the Pharisees are accusing Jesus of breaking the law. To do this, they have to use Wacko-logic.

From Guzik’s Commentary —
Jesus and His disciples are accused of breaking the laws of the Sabbath.

a. [Jesus’] disciples began to pluck the heads of grain: There was nothing wrong with what they did, because their gleaning was not considered stealing according to Deuteronomy 23:25. The issue was only the day on which they did it. The Rabbis made an elaborate list of “do” and “don’t” items relevant to the Sabbath, and this violated one of the items on this list.
i. When the disciples began to pluck the heads of grain, in the eyes of the religious leaders they were guilty of:

• Reaping.
• Threshing.
• Winnowing.
• Preparing food.

Four violations of the Sabbath in one mouthful!
ii. At this time, Judaism [was filled] with elaborate rituals related to the Sabbath and observance of other laws. [The Pharisees] taught that on the Sabbath, a man could not carry something in his right hand or in his left hand, across his chest or on his shoulder. But you could carry something with the back of your hand, with your foot, with your elbow, or in your ear, your hair, or in the hem of your shirt, or in your shoe or sandal. Or, on the Sabbath, you were forbidden to tie a knot – except a woman could tie a knot in her girdle. So, if a bucket of water had to be raised from a well, you could not tie a rope to the bucket, but a woman could tie her girdle to the bucket!
b. Look, why do they do what is not lawful on the Sabbath? Jesus never violated God’s command to observe the Sabbath, or approved of His disciples violating God’s command to observe the Sabbath. But He often broke man’s legalistic additions to that law, and He sometimes seems to have deliberately broken them.

CPS uses Whacko-logic too. They told a judge they were “concerned” because they “found” two bags of garbage near our front door. The DFCS worker saw this only because he was trespassing and had entered the house without permission. What the socialworker actually saw was two bags of laundered clothing that had been placed off to the side of the foyer where they were waiting to be donated to a charity. The truck was scheduled to come by later that day for a pick-up. As it happened, when we were summoned to the DFCS office, their hallway was filled with nearly a dozen large bags of shredded documents. The 30-gallon clear plastic bags blocked enough of the walking area that we had to go single file; clearly, this could have been considered a fire hazard. They want the world to believe that they are noble for recycling, but they want the judge to believe that a parent keeps a trashy house by donating used clothing.

They are pharisaical dissemblers.

Bibliography Information
Guzik, David. “Commentary on Mark 2”. “David Guzik’s Commentaries on the Bible”. <http://www.studylight.org/com/guz/view.cgi?book=mr&chapter=002&gt;. 1997-2003.
clipart credit

Read Full Post »

[♦[♦[ Part of the series on How Child Protective Services opposes the Teachings of Christ ]♦]♦]

21No one sews a piece of unshrunk cloth on an old garment. If he does, the patch tears away from it, the new from the old, and a worse tear is made. 22And no one puts new wine into old wineskins. If he does, the wine will burst the skins – and the wine is destroyed, and so are the skins. But new wine is for fresh wineskins.
Mark 2

Each of these verses could be considered as a mini-parable. In the strictest interpretation of the parables, the old form and structure of Judaism is not able to co-exist with the new Messianic Judaism that Jesus is ushering in. Within a generation, the Gentiles who had no roots in the old ways will pick up the ball, name it Christianity, and run with it.

In the cloth example, the new must shrink to fit the old, and in the wineskin example, the old must be pliable and expandable to contain the new. Because Jesus gave the two examples back-to-back, it is reasonable to conclude that both parties will have to adjust in different ways if there is to be a workable outcome.

In a broader interpretation, inflexibility is destructive. CPS is rigid and unbending. Those who try to cooperate quickly find that they are the ones who must do all the giving. CPS’s idea of cooperation is taking only a portion instead of all. They expect people to cower and shrink to fit CPS’s old rigid cloth.

If that does not work, CPS moves on to Plan B. They intentionally brew situations that subject their victims to increasing pressures. They add their threats and accusations that will accelerate decay in relationships. When something ferments, the sweet sugar is converted to toxic alcohol. Carbon dioxide gas builds up. CPS knows that if they can increase the pressure enough, the situation will explode. Then they can say that the exploding wineskin “proved” that CPS was right all along.

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »