Apparently the New World Order Puppet-Masters have coronated the next Democrat Party nominee for the 2020 Presidential election: Pete Buttigieg. This should be interesting… I have many dots to connect here. Unlike regular news that prints propaganda and an occasional fact, this post is an attempt to partially explain the warfare of the unseen spiritual realm.
First, an introduction to “Mayor Pete,” South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg. You are reading this in print, and you cannot escape the ‘Butt’ joke in his last name, of course, the u is pronounced as “Ooo!” I find this diabolically ingenious—almost as if he were born for this. On soundbites the initial “Boo” syllable slides right on by as a normal speech sound, but in the silence of print Lucifer laughs at his stooge, Peter Buttigieg.
The craftiness of the devil hasn’t been all that hard to discern, so far. He led off with a plethora of crazies, so many that they could be easily reduced to social white noise at the ripe time: Elizabeth Warren’s Pocahontas alter has been her disqualifer; no one likes a Harvard law school professor to lie about her credentials. Bernie Sanders entered already hamstrung by the Clinton machine. Joe Biden, aka “Creepy Uncle Joe” is not going to be a vote-magnet because too many people have scary childhood memories they will project on him and reject his candidacy. I could go on, but I do not need to. The suddenness of coagulating talking points in the media clearly points to Mayor Pete ascending to Satan’s Step-Two of the scheme to socialize America.
Mayor Pete is not concerned about the Boomers, and probably won’t even try fake appeasement until he’s desperate. Of course, anyone competitively taking on Mr. Trump will eventually run into desperation. Hillary did. But so far Mayor Pete’s speeches have implied that anyone older than 40 has screwed over their kid’s ability to achieve wealth. The exact quote is, “If nothing changes economically, we’ll be the first generation to make less than our parents.” (Interview S Cobert) Right out of the gate he’s flirting with breaking one of the Ten Commandments that is reprinted in the New Testament as Ephesians 6:2, “Honor your father and mother.”
[To explain warfare in the supernatural realm I primarily use the Holy Bible, and occasionally the Book of Enoch or the Apocrypha, as a baseline. Buttigieg’s political positions are also in rebellion against biblical teaching on the environment, the sovereignty of nations, and the directives for sexual relationships, but the focus of this post will be much narrower.]
So let’s Get on with it…
I am going to stick to Buttigieg’s coverage in this April 3 article by Jilio Rosas on mediaite.com
Beginning with the headline:¹
Mayor Buttigieg: It’s Hard to Look at Trump’s Actions and Think He Believes in God
To see the spiritual warfare, statements like this need to be reverse engineered. I am not concerned about what Buttigieg thinks of Trump, I am looking for how he thinks about God.
But right away, the article starts quoting CNN’s Kirsten Powers writing in USA Today, so we have to go there for a bit. This is where Buttigieg argues that, “Christian faith is going to point you in a progressive direction.”
No, Pete, it does not. Allow me to prove it.
Despite the partisan pettiness, progressives like to project the idea that “we” are all in this together. “We” all need to get along because “we” have a duty to the poor and disadvantaged, “We” need to save the environment. “We” all need single payer healthcare. “We” need heavy public investment in free and accessible education.
Christianity does not point in any of those directions. It does not point to public education; that was the responsibility of parents, and in practical application during Jesus’ life on Earth, boys would attend the local synagogue school from age seven until their bar mitzvah at age 13. No issue of separation of church and state either! Healthcare was not a role for government. As for care of the environment, the earth is a creation of the Lord’s, not a result of evolution. Landowners were supposed to be stewards of their natural resources as caretakers of the earth, and what we now refer to as “natural” disasters were to be avoided by removing sin from the land. That may not sound too “scientific” to our modern Western minds, but… here is a link to the connection that defies coincidence between horrific weather and messing with Israel’s land.
Progressives support Freedom, but their definition is alien to Christianity. They want a woman to have “freedom” to chose abortion; Jesus said that He came “to proclaim deliverance to the captives and recovery of sight to the blind, to release the oppressed.” Freedom from the curse of the law, from death itself, is not likely to point you in a progressive direction. One clear distinction needs to be made: The Bill of Rights enumerates rights. It gives Americans the rights to specific freedoms. Progressive speech writers often blur rights and freedoms. The difference between that right-to-freedom and that of Christianity is determined by who bestows it. For Progressives, legislators vote on your freedoms, but Christianity aligns with the Declaration of Independence and recognizes that inalienable rights are bestowed by one’s Creator. That is not pointing Christians in a “progressive direction.” John 8:36 encapsulates the freedom from Christ: So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed.
Yet another reason that Mayor Pete is just plain heretical when he asserts that “Christian faith is going to point you in a progressive direction,” is in the conflicting progressive view of “Opportunity.”
[T]he concept of opportunity has two components: one focuses on political equality and the other on economic and social arrangements that enhance our lives. The first component of opportunity prohibits discrimination against anyone based on race, gender, ethnicity, sexual orientation, religious faith or non-faith or disability. It also embraces the diversity of American society by ensuring all people—not just the rich and powerful or dominant racial and ethnic groups—have the chance to turn their talents and ambitions into a meaningful life. The second component of opportunity involves the conditions necessary for people to be secure and move up in life—health care, education, a decent job, labor rights, a secure retirement.²
Biblical Christianity not only distinguishes between male and female, Romans 1:24-27 plainly states what God thinks of “unnatural, degrading passions.” And—News Flash—God is not all that concerned about your secure retirement. He has his own plans for your life, assignments and appointments for your service to Him. The Christian faith is not about securely moving up in status; it is about the Kingdom of the Lord. “Thy Kingdom come, Thy will be done, on Earth…” Ring any bells? It should. The Lord’s Prayer is not a progressive manifesto. The life-goals for a Christian servant have little resemblance to the goals of a progressive: Man’s chief end is to glorify God, and to enjoy him forever.³
Progressives like Mayor Pete are for decent paying jobs and benefits for workers. Those programs cost money, (read taxes,) so before I switch from showing why Bittigieg’s version of Christianity is false and get to my “real” topic of Spiritual Warfare, let me add a bit about God’s economics. He originated the tithe. The tithe is a 10% tax rate, proportional for everyone. In God’s house, 10% is enough to maintain the infrastructure, pay the priests, feed he sheep, and care for the poor. Progressives like (♫ ta da!) “progressive” tax rates where some pay more than others. Christian faith is NOT going to point you in a progressive direction when it comes to taxes. Christian faith is going to point you toward proportional taxes limited to real needs, not pork, certainly not pork!
And now…
The Bad Judgment of Mayor Pete
Here is a man (Buttigieg) who does not know what biblical Christianity is, but has pursued a strawman version of what he thinks a Christian should be: an apologetic, modest-mouthed, self-effacing, and differential dork. Buttigieg has No Clue who Jesus is. Jesus is the Lion of a Tribe! He is the King of Kings. Jesus has power and authority that he gives to men whom he can trust with it. Donald Trump is one of those men.
Let’s unpack this line by line. Buttigieg’s quotes from the article are in italic.
…it is hard to look at the actions of President Donald Trump and think he believes in God. Dude! It is hard to see how anyone who did not believe in God could withstand the 24/7/52 attacks! The very fact that he is still here, unwavering, accomplishing things in the face of relentless spiritual onslaught ought to be proof that He not only believes, but has strong belief!
“I’m reluctant to comment on another person’s faith, but… Sure you are. You’re not only reluctant, but are too humble to presume to judge. (eyeroll of hypocrisy)
“I just don’t understand how you can be as worshipful of your own self as he is and be prepared to humble yourself before God. I’ve never seen him humble himself before anyone. And the exaltation of yourself, especially a self that’s about wealth and power, could not be more at odds with at least my understanding of the teachings of the Christian faith.” Okay, I have already covered how Buttigieg’s “understanding of the teachings of the Christian faith” are lacking, so we do not have to cover that again. Beyond that, (a) it is unrealistic to expect to see a President’s private conversations with God. His other expectations of Christianity indicate that he lacks discernment to know Trump’s heart. This is spiritual blindness. And (b) he’s probably revealed more about his own thoughts on wealth and power than he meant to; he is uncomfortable with Trump’s open candor. That’s a red flag for activity in the unseen realm; when people are uncomfortable with plain-spokeness, it it time to rev up your spidey-sense.
“Buttigieg also criticized conservatives ‘saying so much about what Christ said so little about, and so little about what he said so much about,’ like how the issue of abortion has become a litmus test.” Okay, there are several counter arguments for this. Historically, the Jews were not doing abortions at this time. It was one of the things that separated their identity from the surrounding cultures. Gospel writers had a wealth of material to cover and John said a lot was left out. It cannot be considered approval for abortion simply because we do not have a record of Jesus condemning it. Separately, the Christian view of a biologically unique person, a spiritual being with a soul made in the image of God, and whose life-plan is on record in the heavenly books, cf Psalm 139, actually does make a good litmus test. Giving a woman who self-admits that she won’t care for her own offspring the authority to kill it is empowering the crazies.
“I think it’s unfortunate [the Democratic Party] has lost touch with a religious tradition that I think can help explain and relate our values. At least in my interpretation, it helps to root [in religion] a lot of what it is we do believe in when it comes to protecting the sick and the stranger and the poor, as well as skepticism of the wealthy and the powerful and the established.” The words religious tradition stick out. What is this ‘religious’ tradition of ‘government?’ Do governments have religious traditions? Monarchies often do, but for eight years of Obama the mantra was that America was never a Christian nation—so somebody needs to get the Democrat’s story straight. Traditionally, the sick, the stranger, and the poor were helped by families in the local community, not by government, and government was not actively shipping in poor, sick strangers either! I cannot find much logic to Buttigieg’s “reasoning.” Also resurfacing is his “skepticism of the wealthy and the powerful and the established.” Okay, he hates Trump, we get that. But there is an underlying jealous darkness that is greater than merely trying to politically separate himself from a rich establishment. Besides, Trump never was and never will be establishment, so is this an attempt to distance himself from being identified with rich Democrats? It is hard to tell who Buttigieg is playing to here, and that does not instill trust because it smacks of trying to control a hidden narrative.
I would say it is hard to look at this president’s actions and believe that they’re the actions of somebody who believes in God. One of the ‘markers’ of an unseen spirit’s influence is hypocrisy. Generally, the easier it rolls off the tongue, the more comfortable the hypocritical person is with it; over time the conscience is seared over and cauterized to a point that he/she cannot see the anomaly of the statement. Maybe Buttigieg did not offer an example, or maybe his interviewer neglected to ask… whatever, the article did not name a specific action that made Buttigieg doubt Trump’s belief in God.
Meanwhile, the article provided a trifecta of actions to make the reader doubt Buttigieg’s commitment to biblical Christianity. 1. He is pro-abortion, 2. he is gay, and 3. he made snarly and unloving statements. Yes, I must say, it is hard to look at his actions and believe that they’re the actions of somebody who believes in the Christian God.
Footnotes
¹ ://outline.com/jYpeeE
² Yates, A, and A Bartley. “Progressive Thinking.” Scribd, American Values Project, 2016, http://www.scribd.com/document/131793272/Progressive-Thinking.
³ Westminster Shorter Catechism
https://www.elle.com/culture/career-politics/a26985815/pete-buttigieg-presidential-election-2020-issues/ (not quoted but used for background)
twisting truth 